Policy Changes Immigration Policy Transgender Policies Immigration Reform Biden Administration Policy Impact Military Regulations Defense Policy Immigration Enforcement Military Policy Legal Challenges National Security Law Enforcement Policy Implementation Transgender Issues Citizenship Policy Policy Enforcement Immigration Policies Civil Rights Department of Defense Department of Government Efficiency Gender Policy AI Regulation Education Initiatives Discrimination Policies Policy Decisions Foreign Aid Policy Regulatory Changes Policy on Sports Policy Critique Department of Education Aid Review Process Language Assistance Federal Oversight Linda McMahon Policy on Antisemitism Sports Regulations Firearms Regulations File Releases Funding Decisions TikTok Ban Education Funding Agency Policies Media Policy Education Reform Union Rights Geographical Naming Refugee Resettlement Transgender Military Ban Tren de Aragua Refugee Programs Legislative Actions Geographic Names Legal Restrictions Legal Reforms Department of Labor Judicial Challenges Election Integrity NIL Regulations Refugee Admissions South African Politics Refugee Policy Judicial Response Immigration Restrictions Foreign Relations Economic Sanctions Citizenship Policies Restoration of Monuments Trade Measures Sports Policy Immigration Crackdown Immigration Guidance Healthcare Policy Historical Restoration Crime Emergency Census Policy Flag Protection Transgender Policy Justice Department Gender Policies State Policies Legal Enforcement Legal Actions Gender Designation Flag Protection Laws Visa Programs Immigration Policy Changes State Department Financial Regulations Technology Policy Gender Recognition Policies Policy Initiatives Dismantling Departments Retirement Policies Election Monitoring Implementation Labor Relations Inflation Reduction Act Homeland Security Healthcare Regulations
The case tests federal preemption claims over state health-based drilling limits.
