Sentencing Defendants Judicial Decisions Judicial Process Prosecution Convictions Murder Trials Appeals Judicial Outcomes Evidence Charges Legal Proceedings Testimonies Judgments Political Trials Assault Charges Supreme Court Victim Rights Verdicts Political Corruption Acquittals High-Profile Cases Judicial System Celebrity Trials Trial Process Defamation Acquittal Witness Testimonies High-Profile Trials Witness Testimony Political Figures Bail Hearings Trials Federal Court Sexual Offenses Donald Trump Hush Money Case Assault Cases Jury Trials Indictments Assault Defense Strategies Testimony Violent Crimes High Court Bail Applications Sexual Assault Guilty Pleas Political Crimes Federal Cases Victim Advocacy Plea Bargains Judicial Sentencing Trial Protests Fraud Cases Judicial Proceedings Attempted Murder Evidence Presentation Legal Defense Bail Conditions Defendant Rights Jury Verdicts Threats Family Law Suspects Arrest Warrants Child Abuse Cases Accusations International Law Political Charges Corruption Environmental Crimes Defense Legal Rights Dismissal of Charges Human Rights Jury Selection Violence Domestic Violence Cases Federal Courts Legal Representation Arraignment Assassination Attempts Influencer Cases Youth Offenders Plea Deals Felony Charges Corruption Cases Magistrates' Court Bail Money Laundering Arrests Terrorism Manslaughter Witness Tampering Malegaon Blast Case Murder Cases Public Figures Political Violence
The review stems from an appeals court directive to examine whether trial evidence touched on official acts protected by presidential immunity.
