Election Interference Election Fraud Legal Proceedings Prosecution Voter Fraud Fraudulent Activities Voting Rights Fraud Voter Registration Presidential Immunity Vote Buying Fraudulent Practices Judicial Proceedings Corruption Federal Charges Voter Rights Fraud Cases Fraud Investigation Voting Violations Bribery Laws Conspiracy Charges State Law Court Cases Fraud Charges Political Offenses Immunity Legal Challenges Election Tampering Charges Model Code of Conduct Public Official Election Act Accountability Racketeering Special Counsel Political Corruption Election Integrity Conspiracy Violations Immunity Claims Vote Harvesting State vs. Federal Jurisdiction Campaign Financing Election Security Tampering with Voting Machines Voting Offenses Campaign Finance Donald Trump Fraudulent Voting Voter Registration Law Federal Prosecution Investigations Forgery Federal Cases Misconduct Political Accountability Disinformation Voting Regulations Voter Suppression Voter Intimidation False Documents State Prosecutions Political Prosecution Indictments Legal Cases False Information Conviction Cases Enforcement Legal Violations Canada Elections Act Voter Registration Fraud Voter Privacy Campaign Finance Law Voting Machine Tampering Voter Fraud Cases Voter Qualifications Representation of the People Act Candidate Disqualification State Prosecution Public Offenses Representation of People’s Act Prosecutorial Decisions Pardons Felony Vote Buying Regulations Federal Requests State vs Federal Law Political Rights Prosecutorial Actions Federal Law Charges and Indictments Misconduct in Office Supreme Court Rulings Federal Election Subversion Political Trials Electoral Violations Immunity Rulings Legal Charges Political Crimes Threats and Intimidation Immunity Clauses
Only the governor can change a state sentence in Peters’ case.
