Police Misconduct Police Accountability Law Enforcement Freedom of Expression Freedom of Speech Protests First Amendment Excessive Force Immigration Law Hate Crimes Use of Force Police Conduct First Amendment Rights Protest Rights Legal Proceedings Police Brutality Political Dissent Religious Freedom Free Speech Deprivation of Rights Government Accountability Search and Seizure Due Process Law Enforcement Misconduct Privacy Rights Assault Inmate Rights Hate Speech Press Freedom Fraud Investigations Military Law Prison Conditions Homeless Rights Sexual Assault Wrongful Imprisonment Retaliation SC-ST Act Litigation Judicial Proceedings Discrimination Law Police Procedures Wrongful Detention Sexual Exploitation Freedom of the Press Constitutional Rights Freedom of Assembly Political Trials Gender-Based Violence Justice Department Murder Cases Legal Discourse Prosecutorial Decisions Federal Prosecution Prisoner Rights Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act Detention Protest Laws Law Enforcement Practices Human Rights Violations Abortion Rights Voter Intimidation Victim Rights Wrongful Conviction Legal Defense Inmate Treatment Defamation Pro-Life Advocacy Abortion Laws Federal Actions Legal Criticism Judicial Actions Police Powers Conspiracy against Rights FACE Act Justice Department Investigation Racial Discrimination Activism Private Policing Free Speech Laws Arrests Public Officials Police Actions Political Rights Academic Freedom
The fast-moving case tests press protections against federal claims of coordinated intimidation inside a house of worship.
