Particle.news
Judicial Decisions Voting Rights Judicial Review Legal Challenges Voting Regulations Term Limits Political Rights Political Accountability Voting Procedures State Regulations Litigation Legal Proceedings Federal Regulations Electoral College Campaign Contributions Voter Registration Ballot Access State Authority Judicial Rulings Political Corruption Judicial Authority Fraud Cases Legal Controversies State vs Federal Authority Ballot Regulations Political Parties State Supreme Court Decisions Candidacy Restrictions Electoral Process Electoral Procedures Procedures for Bundestag Parliamentary Law Insurrection Clause Legitimacy of Elections Romania Financial Transparency Ballot Measures Mandates Georgia Presidential Eligibility Legal Strategies Federal Constitutional Court Political Eligibility Election Commission Political Norms Referendum Process Chancengleichheit Supreme Court Legal Opinions Martial Law Postal Reorganization Act Election Integrity Election Authority Decisions Legal Procedures Legal Frameworks Voter ID Laws 14th Amendment Ballot Disqualification Gerrymandering Unconstitutional Acts Local Laws Insurrection Court Proceedings Candidate Eligibility Court Rulings Democracy Political Amendments Federal Authority Waqf Act Voter Rights Political Dissolution Federal Courts Political Party Regulations Political Disobedience Voting Rights Legislation Political Candidate Regulations Lese Majeste Law State Resources Legal Rulings Electoral Processes Municipal Election Procedures Censorship Law Ballot Initiatives
A new law shifting appointment power from the Democratic governor to the Republican state auditor has taken effect, with implications for a contested Supreme Court election.
