Particle.news
Regulatory Compliance Litigation Regulations Wildlife Protection Wildlife Protection Laws Clean Air Act Regulatory Framework Clean Water Act Endangered Species Act Climate Change Litigation Climate Litigation Pollution Control Corporate Law Climate Change Law Regulatory Actions Public Health Law Court Rulings National Environmental Policy Act Administrative Law Climate Change Waste Management EPA Regulations Constitutional Law Court Decisions Indigenous Rights Air Quality Regulations Regulatory Authority Regulatory Frameworks Wildlife Conservation Legal Challenges Water Pollution Human Rights Law Corporate Liability Marine Mammal Protection Act California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Management Court Cases Climate Change Legislation Federal Regulations Consumer Protection Public Nuisance Climate Justice Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act Court Proceedings Land Use Law Waste Management Regulations Maritime Law Judicial Decisions National Green Tribunal Water Law Regulatory Agencies Nuclear Law Climate Legislation Wildlife Regulations Toxic Substances Supreme Court Toxic Substances Control Act Water Rights Hazardous Waste Management Regulatory Law Legal Actions Energy Law Wildlife Protection Law Legal Proceedings Tribal Law Energy Regulation Pollution Regulations Air Quality Standards Pollution Property Law Wildlife Conservation Law International Law Agricultural Law Pollution Law Hunting Regulations Animal Rights Climate Law Land Use Fundamental Rights Waste Management Law Indigenous Law Supreme Court Decisions Judicial Review Permitting Process Lacey Act Rivers and Harbors Act Lawsuit Rights of Nature Negligence Hazardous Waste Constitutional Rights Fossil Fuels Compliance Climate Change Lawsuits Transportation Law Tax Law Land Use Regulations Hunting Law EU Law Chemical Regulations
The draft rule redefines 'harm' to exclude habitat destruction, triggering a 30-day public comment period and pledges of legal challenges from environmental groups.
