Appeals Player Rights Sanctions FIFA Regulations Regulations Player Violations AFA Regulations Regulatory Bodies Player Conduct Fines Racism in Sports Sports Governance Judicial Decisions Foul Play Regulations Judicial Review Player Sanctions Ethics in Sports Fines and Penalties Conduct Violations Case Studies Racism Legislation Violations UEFA Regulations Player Suspension Improper Conduct Foul Play Player Suspensions Appeals Process Regulatory Commissions Athlete Conduct Independent Panels Penalties Conmebol Regulations Legal Consequences Player Contracts ICC Regulations Hearing Processes Incident Reports Sports Conduct Commissions Football Australia Financial Penalties Incident Investigation Foul Play Review Fan Conduct Athlete Rights Legal Rights Case Reviews National Teams Violence Regulations Hearing Outcomes CBJD Governing Bodies Racial Discrimination Hearing Process Suspension and Fines Homophobia Legal Proceedings Sanctioning Provisions STJD CAF Regulations Legal Sanctions Ethics Committees Federation Regulations Racism and Discrimination NFL Regulations Precedents Regulatory Compliance LFP Regulations Player Eligibility Burden of Proof Tribunal of Discipline Impersonation Case Resolutions Conduct Rules Judicial Process Charges Rugby Football Union Governance Offensive Conduct Hate Speech Court of Arbitration for Sport Investigations Football Governance Coaching Regulations Bans FIDE Disciplinary Code Legal Decisions Match Review Gender Discrimination Match Regulations Football Federation Conmebol Racism Allegations Sporting Bodies Tribunal Decisions Tribunal Hearings Case Law Criminal Justice FIFA Disciplinary Committee
The reduced sanction keeps the Sharks lock out through late March across URC plus Champions Cup fixtures.
