Protest Rights Religious Freedom Censorship Protest Laws Public Demonstrations Hate Speech Legal Challenges Legal Cases Legal Actions Protests Right to Protest Antisemitism Press Rights Judicial Decisions Police Actions Legal Proceedings Religious Symbols Public Order Campus Policies Legal Controversies Political Repression Defamation Political Protests Discrimination Censorship Laws LGBTQ+ Rights Hate Speech Legislation Political Rights Legislation Government Authority Government Surveillance Regulations Dress Code Legislation Judicial System Government Actions Public Decency Religious Attire House Arrest Internet Law Press Freedom Political Expression Venue Policies Sports Law Online Safety Police Powers Legal Decisions Police Action Interpretation of Gestures Legal Amendments Harassment Media Rights Legal Protections Arrests Regulation of Protests Protest Regulations Litigation Digital Rights First Amendment Due Process Immigration Law Threats and Intimidation Public Assembly Clothing Regulations Community Rights Publishing Law Political Speech Labor Rights Social Mobilization Laïcité Regulation Proscription Legal Action Legal Support Political Activism Legal Consequences Legal Boundaries Public Protests Dress Codes Boycotts Academic Expression Hate Crimes Academic Integrity Proscribed Organizations Repression Arrest and Detention Public Behavior Political Arrests Regulatory Oversight Political Discrimination Legal Issues in Censorship Journalism Abortion Legislation Pro-Life Activism Legal Restrictions Political Symbols Demonstrations University Policies Student Demonstrations Company Policies Protest Law
The venue’s president cited threats as he disavowed forcing performers to make political declarations.
