Particle.news
First Amendment Hate Speech University Policies Immigration Law Political Expression Protest Rights Protests Discrimination Legal Challenges Campus Regulations Legal Proceedings Education Rights First Amendment Rights Censorship Academic Freedom Antisemitism Political Activism Political Speech Government Actions Campus Policies Legal Representation Student Rights Religious Freedom Legal Cases Legislation Protest Law Anti-Discrimination Laws Corporate Accountability Campus Rights Counseling Terrorism Activism Legal Ethics Legal Permanent Residents Title VI Complaints Government Policies Government Intervention Discrimination Policies Privacy Rights Judicial System Incitement Government Accountability Legal Actions Inclusivity Political Influence Political Repression Muffling of Dissent Montana Political Advocacy Legal Defense Surveillance Employment Law Hate Crimes Higher Education School Policies Press Rights Assembly Rights Anti-SLAPP Laws Anti-Masking Laws Book Bans Public Demonstrations Gender Identity Parental Rights Due Process Demonstrations LGBTQ+ Rights Litigation Legal Settlements Deportation Laws Censorship Laws Judicial Decisions ACLU Community Activism
The university defends its decision to proceed with the May 7 concert under a contract barring political speech, as federal funding remains frozen and criticism mounts.
