Constitutional Law Rule of Law Judicial Review Due Process Separation of Powers Natural Justice Constitutional Interpretation Constitutional Rights Contract Law Judicial Decisions Presumption of Innocence Burden of Proof Judicial Authority Stare Decisis Statutory Interpretation Criminal Law Habeas Corpus Constitutional Principles Consent Justice System Chevron Deference Presidential Immunity Double Jeopardy Attorney-Client Privilege Jurisprudence Military Law Constitutional Articles Judicial Independence Fundamental Rights Equality Before the Law Ineligibility Evidence Law Cosa Juzgada Constitutional Provisions Article 142 Judicial System Human Rights Civil Rights Precedent Case Law Immunity Judicial Ethics Pardons Rights and Liberties Bail Law Fair Trial Rights Protection Equity in Law Evidence Property Law Jurisdiction State of Law Discretionary Powers Liability Court Decisions Supreme Court Judgments Judicial Processes Immunity Doctrine Trust Principles Purcell Principle Criminal Justice Federal Law Confidentiality Interpretation of Law Lawyer-Client Privilege Constitutionality Defamation Law Indian Penal Code Court Procedures Constitutional Values Rights of the Accused Islamic Law Major Questions Doctrine Objections First Amendment Borrowed Servants Doctrine Common Law Deference to Legislators Appellate Court Cooperation in Crime Common Law Malice Justice Rule of Lenity Public vs. Private Speech Rights Separation of Church and State Brady v. Maryland Dolus Eventualis Professional Privilege Trial Process Murder Universal Jurisdiction Signature Validity Injunctions Government Legal Advice Impeachment Process Defence Lawyers Parliamentary Law Locus Standi Right to Speedy Trial Constitutional Challenges
The per curiam order says the Fourth Circuit failed to apply AEDPA’s deferential review, returning the case for further proceedings.
