Legal Precedents Federal Courts High Court Decisions Appeals Civil Rights Injunctions Appeals Court Supreme Court Constitutional Law Federal Judges Appeals Process Constitutional Court Executive Actions Human Rights District Courts Election Law Labor Relations Human Rights Law Preliminary Injunctions Legal Interpretations Government Accountability Legal Challenges Immigration Cases Immigration Law Legal Guidelines Litigation Land Rights Public Health Policy Legal Appeals Executive Authority High Court Sentencing Legal Reform Family Court Decisions Legal Authority Government Responsibility Transgender Activism Criminal Cases Bail Decisions Legal Ethics Media Regulation Judicial Decisions First Amendment Case Dismissals Public Order Legislative Amendments Asset Recovery Judicial Independence Interim Orders Ninth Circuit Court Political Motivations Utah Supreme Court Transgender Issues Federal Prosecutors Election Disputes Public Sector Legal Reforms Family Courts Family Law Cases Gerrymandering Cases Voter Registration Electoral Legislation Administrative Justice Legal Definitions Legal Decisions Government Regulations Discrimination Laws Human Rights Violations Federal Administrative Court Trump Administration Extradition Cases Federal Appeals Court Political Turmoil Legal Consequences Trade Disputes Temporary Restraining Orders Privacy Rights Federal Government Judges European Court of Justice Marriage Equality Execution Cases State Lawsuits State Supreme Court Civil Service Lawsuits Rehiring Policies Fundamental Rights Executive Orders Press Rights Ninth Circuit Labor Issues Public Interest Litigation Administrative Courts
Judges treated the pronoun and confidentiality rules as neutral conditions of public employment.
