Accountability Bribery Foreign Influence Public Perception Political Accountability Financial Misconduct Influence Peddling Nepotism Misconduct Government Accountability Campaign Finance Misuse of Power Allegations Electoral Integrity Foreign Gifts National Security Threats Insider Trading Investigations Public Trust Transparency Sexual Misconduct Self-Dealing Public Officials Lobbying Financial Mismanagement Quid Pro Quo Responsibility Moral Inability Legal Actions Public Administration International Relations Unethical Practices Conflicts of Interest Political Influence Party Reactions Political Transactions Institutional Mediocrity Election Inducements Irregularities Party Ethics Government Oversight Public Ethics Party Regulations Ideological Corruption Influence on Voters Academic Fraud Campaign Promises Espionage Fraud National Security Public Integrity Government Gifts Criminal Justice Stimmenkauf Voter Inducement Public Statements Financial Power Political Fundraising Elected Officials Ethical Standards Accusations Business Influence Misconduct Allegations Judicial Accountability Judicial Processes Public Funds Precedent Setting Integrity Commission Presidential Actions Money in Politics Collusion Misuse of Resources Accountability in Governance Misuse of Funds Misconduct in Office Legislative Actions Law Enforcement Oversight Pardons Ambition in Politics Vote Buying Legal Framework Sexual Harassment Financial Irregularities UPAC Investigations Legal Accountability Bribery Schemes Unethical Behavior Financial Accountability Public Office Political Morality Legal Violations Legal Issues Sex Trafficking Municipal Governance Deep State Selfish Decisions Congressional Ethics Business Ethics Ministerial Code Emoluments Clause
The lawyer-led inquiry cites extremely severe harm, flagging potential violations of anti-stalking and indecency laws.
