Judicial Oversight Justice Department Media Relations Corruption Public Protests Law Enforcement Judicial Review Law Enforcement Oversight Public Policy Public Trust Public Services Legal Challenges Public Safety Judicial Independence Public Response Opposition Parties Education Policy Ideological Conflicts Executive Actions Legal Compliance Trump Administration Partisan Politics Constitutional Rights Public Inquiry Justice System Judicial Decisions Political Criticism Education Ministers Education Reform Immigration Policy Fraud Allegations Corruption Allegations Welfare State Presidential Actions Ministerial Oversight Ministerial Decisions Public Administration Political Vendetta Legal Proceedings Law Enforcement Relations Police Morale Justice Department Actions Public Sector Employment Public Servants University Relations Data Manipulation Legal Accountability Judicial System Victims' Rights Legal Decisions Human Rights Violations Public Sentiment National Security Agency Oversight Civil Rights Public Health Policy Presidential Decisions Public Demands Public Health Concerns Resignation Demands Agricultural Negligence Public Safety Initiatives Protests Executive Power Public Service Funding Issues Hatch Act Political Campaigns Judicial Orders Political Affiliations Ethics in Government Judicial Actions Public Input Law Enforcement Policies Political Motivations Public Apologies Environmental Issues Constitutional Law Law Enforcement Politics Recognition of Errors Department of Justice Health Incidents Public Interest Litigation Corruption Cases Legislation Corruption Policies Policy Changes Pollution Control Measures Legal Reforms Public Opinion Economic Decisions Civil Rights Issues Budget Allocation Legislative Oversight Trust in Government Legal Actions Refugee Programs Public Figures Historical Recognition Political Pressure
The agency describes a coordinated push with federal investigators to pursue cases, recover funds, restrict program access.
