Public Safety Crime Prevention Criminal Justice Reform Judicial System Criminal Justice Drug Trafficking Civil Rights International Cooperation Civil Liberties Police Funding Crime Policy Facial Recognition Human Rights Public Opinion Crime Legislation Organized Crime Crime Border Control Prison Reform Drug Enforcement Police Accountability Traffic Regulations Drug Policy Cybersecurity Resource Allocation Public Security Illegal Mining Counterterrorism Public Safety Measures Crackdown Operations Public Response FBI Racial Justice Justice System Neighborhood Policing Transparency Immigration Law Public Order Military Involvement Community Safety Immigration Policy Judicial Review Police Practices Naxalism Border Security Police Reform Data Privacy Victim Advocacy Crime Investigation Prison Safety Aviation Smuggling and Trafficking Public Safety Legislation DNA Legislation Use of Force Federal Control Child Protection Policies Censorship Practices Legal Protections Prison Conditions Anti-Naxal Operations Statewide Raids Police Unions Provincial Government Maoist Movement Counter-Narcotics Taser Legislation Police Coordination Data Regulation Youth Detention FBI Involvement Crime Rates Technology Use Armed Forces Special Powers Act Privacy Issues Surveillance Technology Customs Authority Juvenile Justice Immigration Laws Military Presence Racism Digital Rights Surveillance Legislation Federalization Public Commentary Police Presence Public Statements Vaping Legislation U.S.-Mexico Relations Police Missions Selective Enforcement Technology Regulation International Agreements AI Implementation Deportation Policies California Contraband Regulations Police Operations Public Safety Initiatives Surveillance State
The directive expands domestic‑terror probes to ideologically defined targets, prompting civil‑liberties warnings.
