Immigration Policy Policy Decisions Military Deployment Law Enforcement Education Policy Immigration Enforcement Policy Changes Law Enforcement Policies Policies National Guard Executive Orders Department of Justice National Guard Deployment Homeland Security Transportation Policy Legal Challenges Legal Actions Workforce Policies Crime Policy State Relations National Security Public Safety Law Enforcement Policy Policy Actions Environmental Policy Policy Enforcement Funding Cuts Urban Policy Military Policy FEMA Disaster Response Justice Department Sanctuary Cities Legal Battles Education Reform Military Use SNAP Funding Policy Directives Labor Relations Education Funding Border Security Public Policy Legal Appeals Emergency Powers Energy Policy Food Security Health and Human Services Military Actions Transportation Issues Public Safety Initiatives Policy Threats Disaster Management Homelessness Policy Judicial Actions Appointments Law Enforcement Strategy Credibility Issues Policing Immigration Policies Crime Strategy State Requests Transportation Crime Control Measures Agriculture Department Welfare Policy Defense Department National Defense Military Intervention Military Involvement Health Policy Policy Investigations State Governance Donald Trump Executive Authority SNAP Benefits USDA Directives Social Welfare Policy Policy Orders Operation Midway Blitz Emergency Appeals Judicial Appeals Housing Funding Cuts Funding Policies Fraud Allegations Policy Impact Spending Policies SNAP Policy Changes Immigration Issues Health Secretary Actions Federal Investigations Pentagon DHS Federal Overreach Emergency Declarations Trump Presidency Fraud Investigations Deportation Policies Policy Implementation Biden Administration Judicial Decisions
State officials cast the litigation as a check on federal overreach that they say has preserved critical funding.
