Public Policy Transparency Laws Investigations Public Inquiry Judicial Decisions House Oversight Committee Public Protests Reform Initiatives Judicial Oversight Public Spending Public Disclosure Fiscal Responsibility Transparency Public Finance Funding Issues Oversight Democratic Senators No Confidence Votes Media Oversight Public Statements Control Mechanisms Committee Reports Policy Reflection Public Utility Oversight Lawsuits Interdepartmental Coordination Parliamentary Procedures Disaster Management Budgeting Workforce Reduction Police Oversight Parliamentary Proceedings Senate Hearings Elected Officials Political Ethics Lawmakers' Actions Corruption Oversight Committees Political Reforms Defense Policy Political Integrity Welfare Reform Inspector-General Reports Agricultural Support Judiciary Committee Parliamentary Voting Child Protection Public Sentiment Victim Rights Ethics Public Procurement Public Opinion Political Climate Funding Transparency Parliamentary Oversight Cybersecurity Policy Public Apologies Subpoenas Senate Actions Advocacy Groups Data Privacy Privacy Laws Policy Evaluation Justice System Whistleblower Protections Public Information Bipartisan Efforts Fraud Oversight Information Requests Public Discourse Public Safety State Oversight Department of Justice Justice Reform Congressional Actions Inquiry Processes Healthcare Legislation Attorney General Foreign Gifts Oversight Reports Regulatory Bodies House Ethics Committee Financial Oversight Public Corruption Compensation Claims Prevent Review Taxpayer Funds Taxpayer Protection Fraud Investigation
Auditors stress the $1.04 billion reflects lapsed funding, not money readily available.
