Public Policy Public Safety Trump Administration Transparency Economic Measures Senate Decrees Public Response Judicial Review Social Issues Congress Congressional Decisions Education Funding Public Opinion Political Parties Economic Policy Fiscal Policy Security Measures House of Representatives Public Health Judicial Proceedings Judicial Decisions Policy Changes Social Welfare Vetoes Health Policy Bipartisan Support University Funding Parliamentary Procedures Pension Policies Legal Provisions Economic Reforms Science and Technology Investigative Committees Justice System Veto Power International Relations Healthcare Funding Social Media Regulation Federal Government Opposition Public Welfare Council of Ministers Political Strategy Transparency Laws Health Legislation Investigations Emergency Decrees Market Regulation Department of Justice Economic Policies Social Security Social Programs Coalition Government Financial Support Judicial Independence Veto Emergency Declarations Opposition Strategies Opposition Movements Senate Decisions Public Health Initiatives Judicial Reform Opposition Initiatives Decretos de Necesidad y Urgencia Judicial System Budget Proposals Foreign Agents Disability Rights Constitutional Amendments Cybersecurity House Legislation Public Accountability Political Responses Election Timing Judicial Appointments Funding Laws State Laws Party Funding Reforms Ministerial Reforms LGBTQ+ Rights California Lawmakers Law Enforcement Oversight Committees Federal Spending Employee Benefits Migration Policy Bitcoin Legislation Social Welfare Policy Driver's License Regulations Religious Legislation Bans Sports Funding Religious Discrimination Opposition Parties Public Sector Visa Revocation Legal Implications Election Influence
The proposal would impose a 100 percent tax on awards to sitting federal officials who sue the government.
