Criminal Justice Criminal Justice Reform Child Protection Laws Criminal Justice System Judicial Accountability Judicial System Victim Rights Human Rights Gender Equality Judicial Decisions Victims' Rights Justice System Criminal Law Criminal Justice Policy Judicial Oversight Sexual Assault Legislation Victim Advocacy Death Penalty Debate Civil Rights Women's Rights Judicial Independence Rape Law Judiciary Public Policy Judicial Review Consent Laws Child Rights Sexual Violence Legislation Rape Laws Death Penalty Abolition Justice Policy Constitutional Law Accountability Judicial Process Family Law Social Justice Gender Issues Uniform Civil Code Domestic Violence Legislation Civil Rights Legislation Human Rights Advocacy Age of Consent Debate Prosecutors District Attorney Actions Public Opinion Youth Sentencing Victim Protection Laws Anti-Trafficking Laws Youth Justice Sex Trafficking Laws Judicial Efficiency Sentencing Guidelines Sexual Assault Laws Access to Justice Advocacy Juvenile Justice Reform Victim Support Legislation Judicial Conduct Feminism District Attorney Judicial Challenges Government Response Judicial Reform Gender-Based Violence Justice Advocacy Human Rights Legislation Police Accountability Bail Reform Act Federal Charges Church and State Relations Tax Policy Government Action Judicial Policies Sexual Harassment Laws Gender Equity Legislation Women’s Rights Judicial Appointments Animal Rights Advocacy LGBTQ+ Legislation Racism in Law Death Penalty Advocacy Law Enforcement Policies Colonial Laws Youth Justice System Mann Act History Victim Advocacy Groups Attorney General Racial Justice Education Policy Self-Defense Laws Federalism Self-Defense Legislation Youth Offenders Child Protection Corruption Bail Reform Secularism Mental Health Legislation Judicial Guidelines
The judge accepted findings that his mental illness qualifies under Ohio’s bar on capital punishment.
