Court Cases Public Perception Court Decisions Court Trials Criminal Justice Sentencing Appeals Criminal Cases Criminal Trials Trial Process Public Opinion Defense Strategies Court Rulings Court Hearings Criminal Charges Public Interest Public Figures Trials Victims' Rights Public Trust Indictments Convictions Victim Advocacy Criminal Investigations High-Profile Cases Witness Testimonies Courtroom Dynamics Public Trials Court of Appeal Acquittal Prosecution Human Rights Trial Outcomes Court Orders Police Accountability Clemency Civil Rights Court Appeals Jury Trials Public Safety Trial Witness Testimony Prison System Expert Testimony Public Reaction Accountability Habeas Corpus Murder Trials Accusations Mental Health Prison Conditions Investigations Case Management Court Verdicts Bail Hearings Criminal Defense Accused Individuals Corruption Courtroom Procedures Trial Delays Defendant Rights Corruption Cases Witness Protection Evidence Political Influence Defendants Witnesses Jury Verdict Gender Perspective Federal Court Subpoenas Prison Sentences High Court Court System Rights of the Accused Judicial Decisions Defendants Rights Jury Instructions Death Penalty Case Resolution Appeals Process Supreme Court Jury Selection Public Prosecution Emotional Impact Resentencing Courtroom Expert Witnesses Lawsuits Court Appearances Public Reactions Public Outcry Evidentiary Hearings Courtroom Drama Class Action Lawsuit Prosecutorial Discretion Judicial Errors Sexual Harassment Post-Conviction Discovery Courtroom Reactions
Minnesota argues federal agents blocked its investigators, asserting it needs independent access for a potential state case.
