Political Activism Protests Activism Political Expression Censorship First Amendment Academic Freedom Protest Movements Political Discourse Antisemitism Protest Rights Political Dissent Political Repression University Policies Legal Rights Public Opinion Discrimination Media Influence Political Speech Political Protests Hate Speech First Amendment Rights Legal Challenges Political Advocacy Due Process Government Actions Surveillance Dissent Political Violence Public Dissent Government Surveillance Immigration Rights Political Demonstrations Student Activism Public Discourse Political Pressure Digital Rights Political Climate Foreign Nationals Second Amendment Social Media Freedom of Expression Higher Education Academic Institutions Government Accountability University Governance Public Protests Political Retaliation Educational Institutions Dissenting Opinions Political Intimidation Radicalization Public Trust in Justice Religious Expression Political Polarization Nonprofit Organizations University Protests Public Demonstrations Retaliation Political Suppression Academic Responsibility Personal Liberty Activism and Protest Legislation Peaceful Protest Law Enforcement Relations Political Movements Gender Identity Non-Citizen Rights Accountability Democracy Public Assembly Online Activism Digital Activism Radical Movements Gender Issues Public Appeals Protected Speech Government Intervention Legal Barriers Public Policy Public Employees Judicial Independence Social Justice Online Behavior Voter Rights Legal Advocacy Government Regulation Online Expression Political Hypocrisy Gun Rights Political Campaigns Political Advertising Workplace Rights Whistleblowing Political Opponents Youth Rights Gun Ownership Political Discrimination Abortion Issues
Arguing the September directive chills protected off-duty speech, the union petitions a federal judge to halt the investigations.
