Political Prisoners International Law Treatment of Prisoners Hostage Situations Palestinian Prisoners War Impact Treatment of Detainees Detention Conditions Conflict Impact Treatment of Inmates Civilians in Conflict War Impact on Society Legal Advocacy Captivity Issues Health Care in Prisons Impact of War Hostage Crisis International Humanitarian Law Living Conditions Mental Health Child Welfare Health Issues in Prison Hostage Treatment Inhumane Treatment Torture Amnesty International Human Rights Administrative Detention Family Impact Abuse Allegations Detention Government Accountability Palestinian Issues Displacement Impact on Families Psychological Impact of Detention Amnesty International Hostage Negotiations Public Opinion Due Process International Detention American Citizens Abroad Geopolitical Tensions Hostage Conditions Family Communication Incarceration Conditions Treatment of Hostages War Impact on Civilians Medical Neglect Aging Population International Cooperation Deportation Issues Health and Well-being Prison Conditions Advocacy for Political Prisoners Wounded Soldiers Impact of War on Society Mercenaries Criminal Justice Reform Overcrowding Innocence Projects Family Appeals Medical Rights Activism Terrorism Impact Conditions of Detention International Human Rights Law Civilian Impact of War Legal Representation Oversight and Accountability Food Quality Death Row Inmates Abuse in Detention Facilities Legal Assistance Treatment of Minorities Political Propaganda Terrorism Death Row Conditions Bail Rights Detained Citizens Isolation Detainee Issues International Advocacy Consular Access Health Issues Hostage Release Rehabilitation Programs Legal Challenges Victims of Terrorism Communication Rights Palestinian Rights Repatriation Detainee Conditions Treatment of Pregnant Inmates Violence in Prisons Conditions of Confinement Family Reunification Health in Prisons Inhumane Conditions Access to Family
The decision follows family claims of mistreatment that the court rejects.
