Censorship Political Activism Media Rights Political Dissent Political Repression Press Freedom Journalist Safety Media Censorship Media Freedom Journalists' Rights Protests Political Prisoners Access to Information Press Rights Political Persecution Internet Access Activism Academic Freedom Political Expression Artistic Expression Digital Rights Journalism Journalistic Integrity Protest Rights Dissent Civil Liberties Political Dissidents Detention Repression in Russia Media Restrictions Public Discourse Media Responsibility Dissidents Repression Civilians in Conflict Online Safety Legal Protections Intimidation Protection of Journalists Public Response Internet Censorship Protest Movements Censorship Issues Oppression Journalists' Safety Legal Implications Impact of War on Society Public Demonstrations Criticism of Israel Legal Restrictions Violence Against Journalists Legal Rights Racial Discrimination Media Representation Belarus Legal Precedents Government Control Mass Surveillance Political Intimidation Digital Privacy Dictatorship Media Access Media Ethics Media Environment Civic Engagement Media Independence Government Accountability Information Access Political Exile Exile Political Criticism Journalists Public Safety Act Digital Freedom Transgender Issues Regulations Democracy NGO Challenges Intellectuals Internet Freedom Press Freedom Groups Supporters Government Crackdown Media Peaceful Protest Demonstrations Antisemitism Censorship in Technology Political Protests Online Expression Online Criticism Censorship in Literature Legal Consequences LGBTQ+ Rights Opposition Movements Georgia Repression of Journalists Advocacy Public Reactions Intellectual Freedom
The case is widely seen as a test of Hong Kong’s national security law.
