Accountability Disclosure Responsibility Fairness Conflicts of Interest Integrity Honesty Government Accountability Public Accountability Financial Disclosures Conflict Resolution Trust Truthfulness Code of Ethics Philanthropic Commitment Fair Treatment Information Disclosure FOIA Requests FOIA Investigative Counsel Conspiracy Freedom of Information AI Interactions Inquiries Political Accountability Enforceable Code of Conduct Police Accountability Subscription Agreements Elected Officials Athlete Rights Obstruction of Justice Community Engagement Cognitive Exams Evidence Campaign Conduct Open Dialogue Debunked Election Misinformation Financial Conduct Acknowledgment Political Funding Misinformation in Healthcare AI in Media Legislative Ethics Regulatory Compliance Nonprofit Ethics Personal Relationships in the Workplace Privacy Financial Disclosure Courtroom Proceedings Leadership Accountability Board Communications Disclosure of Gifts COVID-19 Scientific Research Influence Influence peddling Travel Expenses Candidate Resumes Information Sharing Trustworthiness Communication Values Narrative Ownership Supreme Court Public Testimony Rights Protection Misinformation Political Purposes Fair Compensation Misjudgment Confidentiality Political Courage Divestment Criminality Freedom of Expression Confidential Agreements Attribution Stewardship Management Expertise Endowment Management Moral Responsibility Responsibilities Secrecy Public Officials Inquiry Coverup Justification Commitments Public Perception Candour Misconduct AI Tools Financial Reporting Record-Keeping Laws Cryptocurrency
Economics Minister Daniela Schmitt defends her conduct before a parliamentary committee as political and internal party pressures mount ahead of the FDP leadership election.