Overview
- X lodged the writ appeal on November 14, with the September 24 single‑judge decision remaining operative until a higher order.
- The High Court registry has yet to number the case, after which it will be listed before a division bench.
- X contends that only Section 69A’s due‑process framework can authorize blocking orders, not notices issued via Section 79(3)(b) through the Sahyog portal.
- The single judge upheld Sahyog as a cooperative mechanism under the IT Act and ruled that X, as a foreign company, cannot invoke Article 19(1)(a).
- The Union government has warned that non‑cooperation with Sahyog could risk loss of safe‑harbour protection and potential prosecution under the IT Act.