Particle.news

Download on the App Store

X Challenges India’s Parallel Censorship Mechanism in High Court

The company argues that the Home Ministry’s Sahyog Portal under Section 79(3)(b) lets thousands of officials order takedowns without Section 69A safeguards.

Image
This illustration photograph shows the logo of social network X (formerly Twitter) displayed on a smartphone.
Image
Illustration of a person holding a mobile that has the X logo on it and 'account withheld' written in a speech bubble

Overview

  • The Karnataka High Court is set to hear X’s petition on July 11 and 17 against the Sahyog Portal and Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act.
  • X says it blocked two Reuters accounts in India on July 5 under a legal demand, but MeitY denies issuing any such order, leaving the source of the directive unresolved.
  • In its July 7 filings, X cited 62 emergency blocking orders issued under Section 69A in April and May to argue that existing procedures already ensure due process.
  • X contends that the Sahyog Portal empowers administrative officers to perform judicial functions by issuing takedowns without procedural checks, threatening its safe-harbour protection.
  • Two Union ministries refused RTI requests for details on recent blocking orders affecting thousands of X handles, citing national-security exemptions and IT Act confidentiality rules.