Overview

• Sanger released a nine-point plan that calls for abandoning Wikipedia’s consensus model, eliminating the approved sources list, ending editor anonymity, and creating an elected editorial legislature.
• He alleges the site suppresses conservative and religious viewpoints and describes a prevailing bias he labels GASP—Globalist, Academic, Secular, Progressive.
• Coverage highlights last month’s Irina Zarutska article dispute, with Wikipedia noting nearly 350 revisions in 24 hours as editors debated deletion and wording.
• Sanger contends that 62 accounts hold outsized authority over administrators and enforcement, and that only 14.5% of these use real full names.
• The Daily Mail reports it received no immediate comment from Wikipedia or Sanger beyond the essay, and broader institutional responses to the proposals were not detailed in the coverage.