Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Washington Supreme Court: Any Applicant May Sue Over Pay Transparency Posting Violations

The ruling follows a legislative change that replaced a $5,000 minimum penalty with a judicial range of $100 to $5,000.

Overview

  • In a 6–3 decision in Branson v. Washington Fine Wine & Spirits, the court held that applying to a specific job posting is sufficient to qualify as a job applicant under the EPOA.
  • Plaintiffs Lisa Branson and Cherie Burke applied to roles at a Tukwila Total Wine store where postings lacked required wage or salary ranges and benefits details.
  • The majority rejected a requirement to prove bona fide or good-faith intent, interpreting “job applicant” by its plain meaning and leaving constitutional challenges for future cases.
  • The dissent warned the reading could encourage serial filings and expose employers to expansive class-action liability for technical posting defects.
  • July 27 amendments now allow courts to award $100–$5,000 per violation based on factors such as willfulness, repeat conduct, employer size, and deterrence, with a five-day cure period after notice.