Walter Sofronoff Challenges Corruption Findings Over Inquiry Document Leaks
The former judge disputes the ACT Integrity Commission's conclusions, arguing his disclosures to journalists were lawful and in the public interest.
- The ACT Integrity Commission found Walter Sofronoff engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct' by leaking confidential inquiry documents to journalists before their public release.
- The commission determined his actions violated the Inquiries Act, undermined the integrity of the inquiry, and threatened public confidence in public administration.
- Sofronoff has filed a federal court application to challenge the findings, maintaining his actions complied with the law and served the public interest.
- The report revealed Sofronoff dishonestly concealed his disclosures from key figures, including Shane Drumgold and the ACT chief minister, preventing legal recourse.
- The case has raised broader concerns about the suitability of former judges to lead public inquiries and the potential erosion of trust in judicial impartiality.