Overview
- Filed Monday in federal court in Miami, the motion asks Judge Darrin P. Gayles to toss the $10 billion case with prejudice and award attorneys’ fees.
- The Journal argues the article is true, pointing to the House Oversight Committee’s public release of the Birthday Book containing a letter identical to the one it described.
- It contends the piece is nondefamatory as a matter of law and says Trump has not plausibly alleged actual malice required for a public-figure libel claim.
- The filing cites anti-SLAPP protections in New York and Florida and warns the lawsuit risks chilling protected newsgathering and reporting.
- Trump maintains the letter is fake and the signature is not his, while the White House has said the released signature is not Trump’s; a judge last week dismissed his separate New York Times suit on pleading grounds.