Particle.news
Download on the App Store

WA Bail Case Exposes Gaps in 'Mandatory' GPS Monitoring for Family Violence Offenders

Officials say courts retain discretion, with tracking not compulsory in this case due to the absence of a prior restraining order.

Overview

  • District Court Judge Seamus Rafferty granted Michael Robert Reynold Radomiljac bail without a GPS device, first to live in Katanning and later to reside in Perth under amended conditions.
  • The judge called electronic monitoring in regional WA "unfair" and "not realistic," citing significant limitations in applying GPS tracking outside the Perth metro area, including places like Bunbury and Katanning.
  • Alleged victim Kelly North says she has gone into hiding and is living in fear after the release, highlighting the human impact of the monitoring shortfall.
  • Premier Roger Cook said the judiciary sets bail conditions and noted tracking was not mandated in this instance because the accused was not subject to a family violence restraining order before the alleged offence.
  • Nationals and Liberal opposition figures argue the government overpromised on a statewide monitoring regime, urging legal changes and better resourcing to ensure devices can be used in regional communities.