Particle.news
Download on the App Store

UTEP Study Finds Postseason Officiating Tilted Toward Mahomes-Era Chiefs

Researchers say the pattern aligns with financial incentives influencing enforcement, while emphasizing correlation rather than intent.

Overview

  • In a peer-reviewed Financial Review paper, UTEP researchers analyzed more than 13,000 NFL penalties from 2015–2023 and reported postseason officiating trends that benefited the Kansas City Chiefs during the Patrick Mahomes era.
  • During playoff games, penalties against opposing defenses were 23% more likely to yield first downs, added an average of 2.36 yards, and were 28% more likely to be subjective calls such as roughing the passer or pass interference.
  • The authors, led by assistant professor Spencer Barnes, frame the findings as consistent with regulatory-capture dynamics in high-revenue settings rather than proof of deliberate misconduct.
  • Comparable effects were not found for the Tom Brady–era New England Patriots or other recent contenders, suggesting the pattern was not broadly shared across dominant teams.
  • The NFL and the NFL Referees Association have rejected the study’s implication of bias, with league officials dismissing the premise, and no league investigation had been announced as of publication.