Utah Judge Invalidates Amendment Allowing Legislature to Repeal Citizen Initiatives
Judge Dianna Gibson rules Amendment D's ballot language misleading and unconstitutional, blocking its impact on the upcoming election.
- Judge Dianna Gibson declared Amendment D invalid, citing deceptive presentation and failure to meet constitutional publication requirements.
- Amendment D, proposed by Republican lawmakers, would have allowed the Legislature to repeal voter-approved initiatives.
- Despite the ruling, ballots will be printed with Amendment D, but votes on it will not be counted unless the decision is overturned on appeal.
- The amendment was introduced in response to a Utah Supreme Court ruling that protected anti-gerrymandering initiatives from legislative repeal.
- Opponents argue the amendment's language misleads voters into weakening their initiative rights, while supporters claim it strengthens the process by clarifying legislative roles.