Overview
- U.S. NATO ambassador Matthew Whitaker warned against “creative” accounting and said allied claims will face monitoring under new oversight mechanisms.
- Italy’s Infrastructure Ministry stated the Strait of Messina bridge is entirely financed with national resources and that no NATO funds are planned.
- The NATO goal is split between 3.5% for direct defense and 1.5% for security and infrastructure, which Italy had explored to classify the bridge as “dual use.”
- The U.S. stance creates a budget problem for the Treasury and Defence in meeting the 5% target without reclassifying large civilian works.
- Domestically, the project has CIPESS approval but still requires Corte dei Conti endorsement and faces legal challenges and local environmental opposition.