US Court Rules Rumble and Trump Media Not Subject to Brazilian Censorship Orders
A Florida judge declared that directives from a Brazilian Supreme Court justice attempting to censor US-based platforms are unenforceable under American and international law.
- The US District Court in Florida ruled that Rumble and Trump Media are not obligated to comply with censorship orders issued by Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes.
- Justice Moraes had attempted to force Rumble to block accounts allegedly spreading misinformation or face platform shutdown in Brazil, which Rumble and Trump Media argued violated US free speech protections.
- Judge Mary Scriven stated that the Brazilian directives were not properly served under the Hague Convention or other international treaties, rendering them invalid in the United States.
- The court emphasized that any attempts to enforce such orders on US soil would require compliance with established legal protocols, which has not occurred in this case.
- Rumble and Trump Media hailed the ruling as a victory for free speech and digital sovereignty, asserting that it sends a strong message against foreign judicial overreach into US platforms.