US and China Oppose Legal Accountability for Climate Crisis at ICJ Hearing
Island nations push for binding obligations on top polluters as the International Court of Justice considers new climate guidelines.
- The US and China, the world's largest greenhouse gas emitters, argued at the ICJ that existing agreements like the Paris Agreement should remain the framework for addressing climate change.
- Vanuatu and other vulnerable nations are urging the ICJ to hold major polluters legally accountable for emissions and provide compensation for climate-related damages.
- US State Department legal adviser Margaret Taylor stated that any new legal obligations should align with current treaties, rejecting calls for historical accountability or reparations.
- More than 100 countries and organizations are participating in the ICJ hearings, which aim to clarify states' legal responsibilities in combating climate change.
- Although ICJ advisory opinions are non-binding, they carry significant influence and could shape future climate litigation and international negotiations.