Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Umar Khalid Disputes Evidence in Delhi Riots UAPA Case

The case moves to charge‑framing hearings on October 28 after his counsel challenged the prosecution’s reliance on delayed witness accounts.

Overview

  • Senior advocate Trideep Pais told Additional Sessions Judge Sameer Bajpai that the prosecution’s case relies on belated statements by protected witnesses and has no physical recoveries tying Khalid to violence.
  • The defence highlighted that Khalid sent only three messages in the DPSG WhatsApp group, faces no allegation of raising funds, and saw no recovery of arms.
  • Pais questioned why statements about alleged meetings on December 8, 2019 and January 8, 2020 were recorded months after the FIR and even after Khalid’s 2020 arrest.
  • He alleged police “poached” co‑accused Tahir Hussain’s driver as a witness, while the Special Cell maintains a months‑long conspiracy involving multiple protest sites and a planned chakka jam.
  • Arguments on charge are listed for October 28–29 in Karkardooma, and Khalid’s Supreme Court challenge to the Delhi High Court’s September 2 bail denial is listed for October 27, nearly five years after his September 13, 2020 arrest.