Particle.news

Umar Khalid Challenges Charge Framing, Cites CDRs and Selective Prosecution

The case now sits at the charge‑framing stage that will determine if the UAPA prosecution proceeds to trial.

Overview

  • Khalid’s counsel told the Karkardooma court that call detail records place him away from the alleged January 8, 2020 PFI office meeting that the prosecution labels a key conspiratorial event.
  • The defence alleged police relied on a late, coached statement by witness Rahul Kasana, noting a prior case where a court had questioned his credibility.
  • Counsel argued there were no recoveries from Khalid and no charge‑sheet claim that he raised or received funds for any alleged conspiracy.
  • The defence said police engaged in “pick and choose” charging, pointing to WhatsApp group admins and other purported meeting participants not named as accused, including figures cited in witness statements.
  • Hearings on October 8–9 were adjourned to October 14 for further arguments; Khalid remains in custody since September 13, 2020, after High Court bail was denied on September 2, with a Supreme Court challenge listed for October 27.