UK's Rwanda Asylum Seeker Bill Faces Opposition and Legal Challenges

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's controversial legislation, seen as a test of democratic norms and human rights protections, is under scrutiny from both wings of the Conservative Party and is likely to face heavy amendment in the House of Lords.

UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has introduced a controversial bill that would allow the UK to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, despite the Supreme Court ruling that the country is not safe for refugees.
The bill, which has passed an initial vote in Parliament, prohibits courts and immigration officials from ruling otherwise, and is seen by some as an example of 'constitutional hardball', a tactic that can threaten democratic stability.
The 'Safety of Rwanda' bill is facing opposition from both the right and the moderate wings of the Conservative Party, with the latter considering amendments to ensure it complies with international law.
The bill is likely to face heavy amendment in the House of Lords and an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights is highly likely.
The controversial legislation is seen as a test of democratic norms and human rights protections in the UK.