Overview
- The Crown Prosecution Service dropped the case on 15 September after saying it did not receive witness statements asserting China was a threat at the time of the alleged offences, citing the 1911 Official Secrets Act and a recent High Court ruling.
- On a visit to India, Keir Starmer said no ministers were involved in disclosure decisions and argued evidence had to reflect the UK’s 2021–23 position, when China was not officially designated a threat.
- Independent reviewer of terrorism legislation Jonathan Hall KC said the public explanation is inadequate and confirmed he is investigating the episode.
- Ex-cabinet secretaries Simon Case and Lord Mark Sedwill challenged the government’s stance, saying China has long been described by intelligence leaders as a threat, while some legal experts questioned the CPS interpretation of the evidential test.
- City AM reported Treasury lobbying to block publication of a cross-Whitehall China audit that was folded into the national security strategy, and the shadow home secretary claimed the government withheld internal and MI5 material he says showed a 2021–23 threat.