Overview

• Jackson’s filing asserts that Turner-Smith chose a school “out of the blue” without engaging in the court-mandated meet-and-confer process and breached commute requirements tied to his rental home.
• Turner-Smith counters that she prioritized Juno’s best interests, maintained good-faith outreach on school selection, and accuses Jackson of blocking her final decision-making power as stipulated in their agreement.
• The former couple agreed to joint legal and physical custody in May 2025 with a provision requiring joint approval for major decisions, but they remain deadlocked over schooling and summer schedules.
• Beyond the school dispute, Turner-Smith sought an uninterrupted summer schedule with Juno while Jackson argued their daughter needs frequent, meaningful contact with both parents.
• A judge has not yet ruled on Jackson’s motion or Turner-Smith’s counterclaims, leaving the custody battle unresolved as both await court guidance.