Trump's 'Iron Dome' Plan Criticized as Costly and Impractical

Experts argue the proposed U.S. missile defense shield would be ineffective against modern threats and could escalate global tensions.

President Donald Trump has proposed a U.S. missile defense system modeled after Israel's Iron Dome to counter hypersonic and intercontinental ballistic missile threats.
Experts emphasize that Israel's Iron Dome is designed for short-range rockets, making it unsuitable for defending the vast U.S. territory against long-range missiles.
The project is estimated to cost trillions of dollars, significantly exceeding the cost of the missiles it aims to intercept, and has been described as fiscally unsustainable.
Critics, including national security analysts, warn that the system's technological limitations and high costs make it unlikely to succeed, with existing U.S. missile defenses already struggling to reliably intercept threats.
Concerns have been raised that the plan could provoke an arms race with nations like Russia and China, further destabilizing global security.