Trump's Hush Money Trial Reveals Deeper Allegations of Election Interference

Key testimonies and evidence suggest the former president's associates feared legal repercussions for their roles in the 2016 campaign.

David Pecker, former CEO of National Enquirer's parent company, testified about the tabloid's role in suppressing stories to benefit Trump during the 2016 election.
AMI's non-prosecution agreement and cooperation with law enforcement highlight the serious legal risks faced by Trump's associates.
Evidence presented in court suggests AMI executives believed their actions helped Trump win the presidency, raising questions about electoral integrity.
Trump's legal team argues that their media dealings were standard practice, but prosecutors challenge this view, emphasizing the unique nature of the arrangements.
The trial continues to draw attention as Trump's former associates provide critical insights into the campaign's behind-the-scenes operations.