Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Trump’s Executive Orders Against Law Firms Face Escalating Legal and Political Pushback

Law firms seek permanent injunctions as DOJ signals defiance of judicial rulings, intensifying debates over executive overreach and constitutional protections.

FILE - The Department of Justice headquarters building in Washington is photographed early in the morning, May 14, 2013. (AP Photo/J. David Ake, File)
Signage is seen outside of the law firm Perkins Coie at their legal offices in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 10, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo
FILE - Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks at a news conference at the Justice Department, Feb. 12, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Ben Curtis, File)
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks after signing an executive order targeting the Perkins Coie law firm in the White House on March 6.

Overview

  • Jenner & Block and WilmerHale have filed motions for permanent injunctions against Trump’s executive orders, which they argue violate constitutional rights and undermine the rule of law.
  • The Department of Justice, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, has suggested federal agencies may bypass judicial rulings that block enforcement of these orders, raising concerns about executive defiance of the courts.
  • Congressional leaders, including Sen. Richard Blumenthal and Rep. Jamie Raskin, are investigating the legality of deals struck by law firms with the Trump administration to avoid sanctions, framing them as threats to civil liberties.
  • Over 500 law firms and bipartisan groups of former officials have filed amicus briefs condemning the orders as unconstitutional and a dangerous precedent for executive overreach.
  • Some major law firms have reached settlements with the administration, agreeing to significant pro bono commitments, while others face internal and external criticism for perceived capitulation.