Overview
- President Donald Trump’s attorney Alejandro Brito sent legal letters to CNN and The New York Times demanding retractions of their June 24 stories on a leaked Pentagon assessment of US airstrikes in Iran.
- The intelligence report contradicted Trump’s assertion that the strikes “obliterated” Iranian nuclear sites and projected only a three- to six-month disruption of Iran’s enrichment capabilities.
- The New York Times refused to retract or apologize, with lead lawyer David E. McCraw insisting the paper would continue reporting its findings without concession.
- CNN rejected the demands and affirmed full support for Natasha Bertrand’s reporting, emphasizing its commitment to accurate public-interest journalism.
- Administration officials characterized the leaked assessment as low-confidence intelligence, launched investigations into the disclosures and warned of potential prosecutions for the leaks.