Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Trump Administration Faces Scrutiny Over Proposed Endangered Species Act Rule Change

A new rule redefining 'harm' under the ESA to exclude habitat protections sparks scientific and political opposition during its 30-day public comment period.

Image
A humpback whale feeds on a school of fish Thursday, May 1, 2025, in Channel Islands Calif. (AP Photo/Annika Hammerschlag)
FILE - A pair of bald eagles call out while resting on a tree next to Union Bay, Jan. 16, 2024, in Seattle. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson, File)
FILE - A baby manatee swimming beside its mother comes to the surface to breathe, at Manatee Lagoon, in Riviera Beach, Fla., Jan. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell, File)

Overview

  • The Trump administration has proposed narrowing the Endangered Species Act's definition of 'harm' to exclude habitat destruction, focusing only on direct injury or killing of animals.
  • Experts warn the rule could severely weaken protections for endangered species, risking population collapse due to habitat loss.
  • Democratic Senators Adam Schiff, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Cory Booker have formally questioned the rule's rationale and whether industry influenced its drafting.
  • Environmentalists argue the rule undermines decades of conservation progress and could lead to extinction risks for species like the Florida panther and spotted owl.
  • The rule is currently in a 30-day public comment period, with environmental groups preparing legal challenges if it is implemented.