Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Trump Administration Faces Pushback Over Proposal to Redefine Endangered Species Protections

Democratic senators and environmentalists challenge a rule change that could exclude habitat destruction from the Endangered Species Act's definition of 'harm.'

Image
A humpback whale feeds on a school of fish Thursday, May 1, 2025, in Channel Islands Calif. (AP Photo/Annika Hammerschlag)
FILE - A pair of bald eagles call out while resting on a tree next to Union Bay, Jan. 16, 2024, in Seattle. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson, File)
FILE - A baby manatee swimming beside its mother comes to the surface to breathe, at Manatee Lagoon, in Riviera Beach, Fla., Jan. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell, File)

Overview

  • The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service have proposed redefining 'harm' under the Endangered Species Act to exclude habitat destruction.
  • Senators Adam Schiff, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Cory Booker sent a letter to the Departments of Interior and Commerce requesting details on the rule's drafting and its potential impact on species protections.
  • Environmentalists and scientists warn that removing habitat protections could lead to the extinction of species such as the Florida panther and spotted owl, undermining decades of conservation efforts.
  • The proposed rule is currently in a 30-day public comment period, with environmental groups pledging to challenge the change in court if implemented.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court has previously upheld that the Endangered Species Act's definition of 'harm' includes habitat destruction, highlighting the legal and ecological stakes of the proposed shift.