Trump Administration Cuts NIH Funding, Prompting Legal and Scientific Pushback

The decision to cap indirect research costs has sparked lawsuits, warnings of long-term damage to U.S. science, and fears of a global talent exodus.

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, announced a $4 billion cut to NIH funding by capping indirect research costs at 15%, down from an average of 27.5%.
A coalition of 22 state attorneys general has sued to block the cuts, arguing they violate federal law and congressional intent, with a federal judge temporarily halting implementation.
Researchers warn the cuts will disrupt ongoing clinical trials, limit basic research, and jeopardize the U.S.'s position as a global leader in science and innovation.
Critics argue the cuts ignore the unique needs of federally funded research compared to private philanthropy, which often covers fewer infrastructure costs.
International scientists and early-career researchers are reconsidering working in the U.S., raising concerns about a potential brain drain to countries like China and Canada.