Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Tribunal Sets Aside eSafety Commissioner’s Takedown Order Against X

The decision found the misgendering post did not meet Australia’s cyber-abuse threshold, prompting X to seek Federal Court relief from its wider online-safety obligations.

Image
Chris Elston won his case against the e-Safety Commission. (AAP Image/Supplied by ADF International)
Image

Overview

  • The Administrative Review Tribunal ruled that Chris Elston’s post misgendering a transgender man lacked the intent to cause serious harm required under the Online Safety Act.
  • Deputy President Damien O’Donovan found the offensive remarks reflected Elston’s consistent views elsewhere and did not constitute adult cyber-abuse material.
  • eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant’s office welcomed the tribunal’s guidance on the statutory test and affirmed its commitment to tackling serious online harms.
  • X’s legal team celebrated the ruling as a free-speech win in Australia and a check on the regulator’s scope.
  • X has launched a fresh Federal Court challenge to consider exemptions from its obligations to remove harmful content, including child sexual abuse material.