Third Circuit Rejects Rehearing in Habba Case, Leaving Disqualification Ruling Intact
The order keeps in place the panel’s finding that the 120‑day limit bars Alina Habba from serving, setting up a likely emergency appeal to the Supreme Court.
Overview
- By a majority vote, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined en banc review, leaving the panel decision that Habba’s service became unlawful after her interim term expired.
- Three judges favored rehearing, Judge Jennifer Mascott is expected to publish a dissent, and Judge Emil Bove did not participate in the vote.
- Judge D. Michael Fisher’s opinion emphasized the statute’s bright line around nomination timing, writing that later withdrawal does not erase a submitted nomination.
- Habba resigned following the panel ruling but stated under oath she intends to return if a higher court reverses the decision.
- The ruling fits a broader pattern in which courts have disqualified other Trump-aligned interim U.S. attorneys, prompting resignations, office reshuffling, and case dismissals in districts including Virginia, California, Nevada, and New York.