Overview
- A one-line comment adopted on October 24 states it is not a violation of the judicial canons for a judge to publicly refrain from performing a wedding based on a sincerely held religious belief.
- The change took effect immediately and modifies Canon 4, which governs extra-judicial conduct and perceived impartiality, without expressly limiting the exemption to same-sex marriages.
- The move grew out of cases involving Waco Justice of the Peace Dianne Hensley and Jack County Judge Brian Umphress, after a 2019 public warning to Hensley was later withdrawn and the Fifth Circuit posed a state-law question to the Texas high court.
- Religious-liberty advocates, including First Liberty Institute, praised the protection for objecting judges, while civil-rights groups such as the ACLU and Equality Texas warned it invites discrimination and undermines confidence in judicial neutrality.
- Legal observers expect further challenges, including potential equal-protection suits in Texas courts, as the U.S. Supreme Court considers on November 7 whether to hear Kim Davis’s petition tied to the scope of Obergefell.